Release Dates - Will They Won't They?

Rhys Rosser • July 24, 2026

The Commencement Provisions for earlier release dates had been due to take effect on 2nd September 2026, however, Prime Minister Andy Burnham has indicated he wishes to review these and that could lead to a revocation of Commencement Provisions

The Sentencing Act 2026 was passed earlier this year, however, there were various commencement provisions which guided when certain provisions of the legislation would take effect.


There were a number of changes which were due to take effect on 2nd September 2026, some of these were stark and others less so.

The Sentencing Act 2026 (Commencement No. 4) Regulations 2026 were passed on 8th June 2026. The commencement provisions are far from straight forward. The approach taken meant that there was a phased release scheme, rather than the change in release date taking effect for all offenders on the same date.


The key provisions which were due to take effect on 2nd September 2026, for some offenders, are found in Section 23 of the Sentencing Act 2026 (release):


(3) In section 244(3) (requisite custodial period for prisoners not subject to special provision for release), for paragraph (a) substitute—

(a)      in relation to a prisoner serving one sentence imposed under section 91 of the PCC(S)A 2000 or section 250 of the Sentencing Code, one-half of the sentence,

(aa)     in relation to a prisoner serving one sentence of any other kind, one-third of the sentence,”.

(4)      In section 244ZA(8) (requisite custodial period for certain violent or sexual offenders), for paragraph (a) (but not the “and” at the end of that paragraph) substitute—

(a)      in relation to a prisoner serving one sentence within subsection (4) or (5), one-half of the prisoner’s sentence,

(aa)     in relation to a prisoner serving one sentence within subsection (6), two-thirds of the prisoner’s sentence,”.


There is, or rather was, intended to be a straight forward change to those who are currently subject to 40% release. From 2 September 2026, offenders receiving standard determinate sentences will become eligible for release after serving one third of the custodial term, subject to specified exceptions that include violent and sexual offences. The existing framework permitting release at the 40% point for many such offenders under SDS40 will be abolished on the same date for all individuals sentenced on or after 2 September 2026.


There are also changes to those who are serving sentences which are not subject to SDS 40 and instead were subject to serving two-thirds. The release date will now be reduced to 50% rather than two thirds, this has led to serious outcry from the public.


The new release provisions due to take effect on 2 September 2026 will also operate retrospectively. Instead of applying retrospectively to all offences on that date, they will be introduced in a staggered sequence, moving upwards through sentence lengths, likely to ease the operational impact on prison and probation services as prisoners become eligible for release.


All of this is well and good, save that the Prime Minister has indicated a wish to review whether these release provisions should take effect.


There is no legal obligation on a minister to exercise a commencement power, but an implied duty exists. The House of Lords confirmed in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union [1995] UKHL 3 that a formal decision never to bring enacted provisions into force would be unlawful. One of the best‑known examples of legislation that has never been commenced is the Easter Act 1928, which fixes Easter Day as the first Sunday after the second Saturday in April and received Royal Assent on 3 August 1928.


Notwithstanding the above, there are examples of where legislation has been introduced through commencement provisions but has subsequently been revoked. The Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 (Commencement No. 2) (Revocation) Regulations 2024. These were due to come into force on 1st August 2024 and 1st September 2025, however, on 25th July 2024 the commencement was revoked. This legislation would have placed a duty on Higher Education Providers to protect freedom of speech and make amendments to civil claims for breach of such rights.


Further support for the approach which may be considered can be found in The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (Commencement No. 2 and Saving Provisions) (Revocation) Regulations 2024. These provisions were due to come into force on 1st October 2024 but were revoked on 17th September 2024. The reforms would have impacted the approach taken to applying EU case law.

In short therefore, it would appear perfectly permissible for the Government to take the view that commencement on 2nd September 2026 is no longer appropriate.


Whether or not a challenge for judicial review on the basis of legitimate expectation were to succeed thereafter will remain to be seen, such a challenge of itself would certainly seem likely if the decision was taken to row back on the early release provisions.

 


Fill in the Below to Contact Rhys and to obtain legal advice

By Rhys Rosser March 11, 2026
Joey Barton's week went from bad to worse, having been ordered to pay Eni Aluko £300,000 he was then refused bail having been arrested for an offence of Section 18 GBH
By Rhys Rosser February 11, 2026
The amendments introduced by the Sentencing Act 2026 have somewhat fallen under the radar, which is surprising given their wholesale changes to the sentencing regime. Not only do they create an assumption of sentences being suspended, they increase the term of a suspended sentence and revamp the role of the Sentencing Council. The purpose of sentencing has also been amended in statute to specifically refer to protecting victims of crime, notwithstanding this has been in guidance hitherto.
By Rhys Rosser October 15, 2025
It is becoming increasingly common for HMRC to refer cases involving outstanding VAT to issue VAT security notices, there can be serious consequences including criminal prosecution.
By Rhys Rosser April 29, 2025
Section 32 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 deals with penalties for carrying clandestine entrants into the UK. It allows the Secretary of State to impose fines on individuals responsible for transporting people who have entered the country unlawfully. This applies to owners, hirers, and drivers of vehicles, including detached trailers.
By Rhys Rosser April 14, 2025
Pursuant to Sections 27 and 28 of the Gambling Act 2005, the Gambling Commission has the authority to investigate criminal offences and to authorise charges
By Rhys Rosser April 9, 2025
Sentencing Guidelines are drafted by the Sentencing Council, a body which was set up in April 2010, Judges and magistrates must follow the guidelines issued by the Sentencing Council ‘unless the Court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so’.
By Rhys Rosser March 30, 2025
Football banning orders (FBOs) are a legal tool used in the UK to prevent individuals involved in football-related disorder from attending matches. Introduced under the Football Spectators Act 1989 , these orders aimed to manage supporter behaviour and ensure the safety of fans and players.
By Rhys Rosser March 12, 2025
In criminal law, murder and manslaughter are both forms of unlawful killing. The key difference between the two offences relates to the defendant's intent when the death was caused. 
By Rhys Rosser March 2, 2025
Section 7 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 states that listed building consent is required before carrying out any works that would alter, extend, or demolish a listed building in a way that affects its character as a building of special architectural or historic interest.
By Rhys Rosser February 3, 2025
A restraint order is an order put in place to restrain funds or assets. It can be applied for either by a prosecutor or an accredited financial investigator. An application for a restraint order may be made in the absence of the parties impacted by the order.